> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://docs.17movement.net/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://docs.17movement.net/conflict-tool/understanding-conflicts/prop-conflicts.md).

# 📦 Prop Conflicts

Prop conflicts happen when multiple resources modify the same YMAP entity but do not agree on its final state.

### When is it a conflict?

Conflict Tool can report a prop conflict when two or more resources refer to the same archetype in the same placement area and disagree about what should happen to it.

Examples:

* one resource deletes a prop while another still places it,
* one moves the prop while another keeps the original placement,
* multiple resources add near-duplicate props in the same location,
* one resource replaces the model while another keeps the original model.

The review panel shows the state contributed by each resource, such as:

* removed,
* moved / changed,
* added,
* unchanged.

### How prop fixes work

The goal is to make every conflicting copy agree so the visible result no longer depends on FiveM's resource streaming order.

A chosen removal or movement can therefore be mirrored across the relevant copies.

### Stale LOD

A resource may hide or remove a prop while another resource still contains its low-detail LOD version.

That can leave a distant "ghost" of a prop floating where the original object used to be.

Conflict Tool mirrors the LOD treatment across copies. If a removed prop leaves behind an orphaned LOD, the tool can sink that LOD out of sight using `Config.Lods.SinkDropZ`.

### Re-modelled prop / archetype swap

Sometimes a resource keeps the same placement but replaces the actual model.

In this case, Conflict Tool can rewrite losing copies to use the chosen model instead of deleting the entity entirely.

### Replacement overlap

Another special case is when a vanilla prop is removed and multiple resources add different replacements in approximately the same location.

Because these replacements may represent intentionally different authored content, some cases can require manual review.